Why do prices for the same product differ so much across brands?
- Shreyanshi Nayak

- May 26
- 2 min read

Imagine you are standing in the medicine aisle at the store. You see a bottle of ‘Panadol’for $10. Right next to it, is the store's very own version with the exact same active ingredients for $3.50. They both treatthe same headache, yet one is nearly three times the price. Why is that so?
Well In economic terms, this isn't just a random choice by the supermarket, this price difference is mainly driven by marketing costs and perceived value. While the two bottles may be indistinguishable when you look at their ingredients side by side the price reflects the invisible costs that a company puts in their brand.
Although it might seem like a scam to pay more just for different branding, it often comes down to the consumer's psychology. When a person buys a recognised brand, they are paying for the guarantee of quality that they feel the logo brings. Big companies spend millions on advertising to make sure their logo is recognisable so that the consumer associates it with safety and reliability.
This is why many people go for the more expensive option. They feel a sense of security in a name that they’ve seen in advertisements since they were children, even if the generic version is chemically indistinguishable. Market experts point out that name brands can charge a premium because customers are willing to pay for the peace of mind that comes with a household name.

So the higher price can often also act as a way for a company to pay off its advertising and their research and development costs as most of time they were the first to create the formula for the product and they cleared it for sale but once their patent expires other generic brands just copy the formula without having to pay for all that initial hard work. These secondary brands can sell for less because they didn't have to fund the original invention and they normally don't spend any money on advertising as their lower price speaks for itself.
Furthermore we must take into account the fact that store brands have a massive advantage because the supermarket owns the building so they don't have to pay the slotting fee to get their products onto the best eye-level shelves. National brands however must pay the retailer just to ensure their product is visible to you. Additionally, many store brand products are manufactured in the same third-party factories as the expensive ones. Because the store buys these in bulk and skips the fancy distribution networks, they can keep the price floor much lower while still making a profit. They aren't cutting corners on the product; they are just cutting out the middleman.
Ultimately the higher price of a name brand often gives you a feeling of security rather than a better formula. When you choose the generic option, you aren't sacrificing quality you’re simply refusing to pay for a company's initial struggle. By looking past, the logo and focusing on the ingredients you can make sure you’re paying for the product not the prestige.



Comments